After reading both of these readings, I am left feeling confused and unfulfilled. To me, literature is used for entertainment and education purposes. I have come to the conclusion that since the intended point of the readings do not stand out to the casual reader it is hard for one to become engaged in the text. "Culture and Anarchy" feels unfriendly to someone looking to find insight in the preface of this particular book. It raises questions about the Bible and how it has stood the test of time. I did find this question to be an intriguing one. Since the Bible has been translated in so many languages and is honored and worshipped by many, it must hold some significance. If a text can be translated in various languages, and still hold it's meaning to many, why can't other pieces of literature do the same? I'm fascinated with how only a few texts can hold true like this.
What is the difference between the words of the Bible as compared to some popular non-fiction book available in stores today? Is it because it's the word of God, and all of his teachings? How can society put so much emphasis and trust in text?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment