Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Fluxus

While reading through this, just as a lot of you all stated, the idea of an exact definition of art keeps coming back up. It makes me think of Andy Warhol and his pieces. Some people say he is stealing something which is copy written and making it into something his own and taking credit for it. Others would call it art. Some people would say that his films are nothing and worthless, a waste of time. Others would call it art. I think that idea comes through out these fluxus pieces. Where is the line drawn, what is art and what is not art? What is the potential of any ordinary object? Is everything around us art?

No comments:

Post a Comment